The past perfect describes an action that takes place before another past action. So, the first part of the sentence should not be in the past perfect.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Hole One a New SeeCan it be correct? If so, why is the first part in past perfect?It can be. You don't really need the past perfect in the first part; it's optional. However, it's fairly customary in by the time clauses to use the past perfect for actions that could not be completed, failed to be completed, or simply were not completed by the time so
Mellie Daracen 7123I may suggest that the first dependent clause should be in the SIMPLE PAST, that is, "by the time the policewoman LOADED her gun, the robber HAD LEFT (past perfect tense ) already {independent clause..The simple past is possible but, as a couple of us have pointed out, so is the past perfect.