Hi CJ. I was more than happy to go with the position you posted but then Bill disagreed with it! So I guess it's up to him to respond. I certainly want the traditional and certainly more 9-10 year old friendly approach as opposed to the modern linguistic approach, which is far too complicated for the kids I teach, or even kids up to 18, I would argue.
Thanks to you both for your responses though!
JPE23 Hi CJ. I was more than happy to go with the position you posted but then Bill disagreed with it! So I guess it's up to him to respond.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
JPE23Hi CJ. I was more than happy to go with the position you posted but then Bill disagreed with it! So I guess it's up to him to respond. I certainly want the traditional and certainly more 9-10 year old friendly approach as opposed to the modern linguistic approach, which is far too complicated for the kids I teach, or even kids up to 18, I would argue.
Thanks