The second is not correct English.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
fivejedjonThe second is not correct English.Thanks. But what part of it is the not correct grammar?
AnonymousIf I were 'been' yelled at, I would be unhappy.Impossible. This is the same verb twice, first in the past, then the past participle. It's equivalent to "took taken" or "saw seen".
CalifJim AnonymousIf I were 'been' yelled at, I would be unhappy.Impossible. This is the same verb twice, first in the past, then the past participle. It's equivalent to "took taken" or "saw seen".You don't think these make sense, do you?If I took taken the money, I would be arrested.If I saw seen him, I would be happy.____________You can have 'had been', but not 'were be
Anonymous. I got confused because I just heard my instructor say itPerhaps your instructor said If I were being yelled at, I would be unhappy.
Anonymousbecause I just heard my instructor say it.Raise your hand and tell him what he said. Then tell him he's an idiot.
CalifJim Anonymousbecause I just heard my instructor say it.Raise your hand and tell him what he said. Then tell him he's an idiot.Well, maybe not. 5jj's guess is more likely.Anyway, 'were been' is never possible.CJHaha
AnonymousThat is why I asked.Or "That was why I asked".
Anonymousare both possible?Yes.
CalifJim AnonymousThat is why I asked.Or "That was why I asked". Anonymousare both possible?Yes.CJThank you. And the word 'being' would be possible instead of 'been' in that original sentence, as shown by Mr. FJ, right?
Anonymous the word 'being' would be possible instead of 'been' in that original sentence, as shown by Mr. FJ, right?Right.