I am writing encyclopedia-like texts about literary devices and am wondering if I should use the names of literary devices (e.g. allegory, oxymoron, dichotomy) with or without the indefinite article "a/an". Does it depend on the context? Here's an example from Wikipedia:
"As a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literary_device, an allegory is a https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metaphor whose vehicle may be a character, place or event, representing real-world issues and occurrences. Allegory (in the sense of the practice and use of allegorical devices and works) has occurred widely throughout history in all forms of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art..."
The word "allegory" here is used with the article in the first sentence and without it in the second sentence. Is there a mistake or is it the way it should be used? Why? Help me clear it up, please.
"Allegory" without the article refers to the literary device in general . "An allegory" is when you are referring to a particular usage. The story of Adam and Eve is a wonderful allegory .
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
"Allegory" without the article refers to the literary device in general.
"An allegory" is when you are referring to a particular usage.
The story of Adam and Eve is a wonderful allegory. (One particular use)
The Bible is full of allegory. (A general remark.)
If you say "an allegory is a metaphor etc," you are giving a particular defi