0
Pooyan Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

usage of would

I'd appreciate it if someone could explain the difference in tense between these two:

It's literally inconceivable to me that anyone, anywhere wouldn't want universal health care.

It's literally inconceivable to me that anyone, anywhere doesn't want universal health care.

Is the usage of "wouldn't" in the first sentence correct, assuming the sentence is referring to a present tense notion? 

Thanks
  

Top answer

Pooyan - 1. It's literally inconceivable to me that anyone, anywhere wouldn't want universal health care. 2.

  • Pooyan - 1.
  • It's literally inconceivable to me that anyone, anywhere wouldn't want universal health care.
  • 2.
  • It's literally inconceivable to me that anyone, anywhere doesn't want universal health care.
  • The first sentence is certainly correct.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

9 Answers
0
Pooyan-
1. It's literally inconceivable to me that anyone, anywhere wouldn't want universal health care.
2. It's literally inconceivable to me that anyone, anywhere doesn't want universal health care.
The first sentence is certainly correct. The second sentence is a little odd, given "literally inconceivable". would is a big head
0
Thanks CalifJim as usual.

In these two sentences:

"I believe that everyone wants universal health care"

and

"I believe that everyone would want universal health care"

can we say that in the first sentence, the speaker strongly believes that everyone wants the universal health care, but in the second sentence there is some uncertainty. The
0
Pooyan"I believe that everyone wants universal health care"and "I believe that everyone would want universal health care" can we say that in the first sentence, the speaker strongly believes that everyone wants the universal health care, but in the second sentence there is some uncertainty.
Not exactly. The strength of the belief is the same. The speaker doe
0
Thanks for the detailed response. One more question:

Does the difference between "wants" and "would want" apply in if-clauses as well:

"I believe If someone wants health care system . . . "

"I believe If someone would want health care system . . . "

This is also an imaginary situation, but as far as I know 'would' is not usually recommended in if-c
0
PooyanDoes the difference between "wants" and "would want" apply in if-clauses as well ... 'would' is not usually recommended in if-clauses
The if-clause and the would-clause are two separate clauses. Don't try to combine these two things by putting 'would' in an if-clause.

If you would want a health care system
0
CalifJimThe if-clause and the would-clause are two separate clauses. Don't try to combine these two things by putting 'would' in an if-clause.
I would appreciate it if you would turn down your radio.

Could this be an exception, CJ?
0
Aspara GusCould this be an exception, CJ?
It depends how you look at it. I don't call it an exception. It's an exception to the main rule, but I call it an example of a "sub-rule", the whole class of sentences with "bargaining" or "reciprocal" would (or will). Two woulds or wills. Exchange of favors. (Appreciation isn't exactl
0
How about the difference between these two:

If you would buy me a beer, I would buy you a pizza.

If you bought me a beer, I would buy you a pizza.
0
PooyanHow about the difference between these two:

If you would buy me a beer, I would buy you a pizza.

If you bought me a beer, I would buy you a pizza.
Nearly the same meaning. In the first one there is more reference to the other person's willingness to buy the beer, as in "If you were wil

Related Questions