You may be to obey the law. These aren't right. I can't think of any clearly correct examples of a modal being used with this sense of "be to".
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Hans51I am learning be to grammar and I was wondering if auxiliaries such as can, could, may, etc can be used for to be grammar, likeWe can be to meet at the post office.You may be to obey the law.These aren't right. I can't think of any clearly correct examples of a modal being used with this sense of "be to". In fact, I can't actually think of a clear
AlpheccaStarsThe sentence is not well-formed. This is perhaps what was meant:The reason (that) the institute added the move could be to strengthen internal unity.In my opinion it is just about well-formed and means "The institute adds (i.e. further says/writes) that the purpose of the move (i.e. action, stance) could be to strengthen internal unity."
GPYI do dislike this sort of omission of "that" though.Yes, it makes the text very difficult to decipher out of context.
Hans51I am learning be to grammarThere is no "be to"! The idiom you are working with is usually called "is to". It only exists in five forms.