I am quite sure that this sentence contains an error, as the soldier in the first part of the sentence is never referred to in the second half. However, I recently came across another variation of this:
As a soldier, your gun is very useful.
Previously, I had assumed this was a grammatical error, as, similarly to the first sentence, the subject is not well connected to the second half. But, according to an outside source, it's a perfectly valid sentence. Also, the subject of the second phrase is "people", so, other than contextually, what grammar connects the "soldier" with "me"? Could I get an explanation about this, hopefully comparing the two? Thanks in advance.
As a soldier, people making jokes about war annoys me.
" If the sentence begins with "As a soldier," the subject of the next part has to do something as a soldier . " "As a soldier, your gun is very useful" is incorrect because your gun does not do anything as a soldier . " As a soldier, you will find your gun a very useful item" is okay.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
I originally thought this sentence w
As an English major, people not knowing the difference between the words "theory" and "hypothesis" irritates me way more than the variations of non-English words adopted by Starbucks to distinguish the size of their drinks from one another.