Hello, everyone!
I know my question could have already been asked a number of times but sometimes it's really hard to find what you need =)
There is an exercise in English grammar in use where two similar sentences are given.
1) My grandfather (die) before I was born. I (never meet) him.
2) I don't know Karen's husband. I (never meet) him.
The right answers are:
1) died, never met.
2) have never met.
It's all quite clear with the second sentence. But I can't understand what's the problem with:
- My grandfather died before I was born. I have never met him. Yes, he died a long time ago, but still, I have no experience of meeting him. Or using of the present perfect suggests that, although I never met him in the past, it still may happen some time in the future, doesn't it? For that reason if my grandfather died, I cannot meet him anymore, hence - the past simple.
OR
An explanation just popped into my head: one can meet a man if only that man is alive. If my grandfather died before I was born (certain point in the past) I never met him while he was alive. As it goes, there is no connection with the present, hence - the past simple.
?????? n explanation just popped into my head: one can meet a man if only that man is alive. If my grandfather died before I was born (certain point in the past) I never met him while he was alive.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
??????? ??????n explanation just popped into my head: one can meet a man if only that man is alive. If my grandfather died before I was born (certain point in the past) I never met him while he was alive. As it goes, there is no connection with the present, hence - the past simple.
Yes.