Yes, with a comma, but it sounds a bit literary.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
enoonYes, with a comma, but it sounds a bit literary.No need for the comma, as with as the comma only helps eliminate ambiguity; not needed here.
AnonymousNo need for the comma, as with as the comma only helps eliminate ambiguity; not needed here.Wrong. Read any professionally edited text. From Strunk, for instance: "Two-part sentences of which the second member is introduced by as (in the sense of because), for, or, nor, and while (in the sense of and at the same time