0
Liveinjapan Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

Until

I had to wait until it had stopped biting.
I had to wait until it stopped biting.

If there's any difference between the two sentences, could you tell me please?
  

Top answer

As far as I know, There is not so big a difference, but: #1 emphasizes the completion of the action because of the past perfect there. I mean the writer imples that" only after it had stopped bitng did s/he get out of it"

  • As far as I know, There is not so big a difference, but: #1 emphasizes the completion of the action because of the past perfect there.
  • I mean the writer imples that" only after it had stopped bitng did s/he get out of it"
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

12 Answers
0
As far as I know, There is not so big a difference, but:

#1 emphasizes the completion of the action because of the past perfect there. I mean the writer imples that" only after it had stopped bitng did s/he get out of it"

0
I had to wait until it had stopped biting. [you could say that in this case the waiting takes more time, to make sure that ...

I had to wait until it stopped biting.
0
until it had sounds like until after it ..., IMO. Waht do you think?
0
Thanks everyone!
I get how the past perfect works here.
0
New2grammaruntil it had sounds like until after it ..., IMO. Waht do you think?

What do you mean does 'until after' imply here, New2?

I think "until after" might imply a time lag between biting and the next action(,or maybe not). But I think the past perfect, to the contrary, indicates 'just after it stoppe
0
LiveinjapanIf the sentence is like 'I didn't do that until it had stopped...,' then it means 'just after it stopped it I did that,' where there may be no time lag, IMO.
I beg to differ. To indicate there's probably no delay, you would need to say "I didn't do that until it stopped". Using 'had' makes the possibility of a delay higher.

But I could be
0
LiveinjapanIf the sentence is like 'I didn't do that until it had stopped...,' then it means 'just after it stopped it I did that,' where there may be no time lag, IMO.
Hi New2

I should have said 'until it had stopped..' and 'until I stopped ...' are not much different in terms of a time lag.
If you want to indicate a time lag, I think you could s
0
LiveinjapanI should have said 'until it had stopped..' and 'until I stopped ...' are not much different in terms of a time lag.
If you want to indicate a time lag, I think you could say 'I didn't do that before it stopped biting.'
I see. So, you would use them interchangeably? I mean, the constructions "until...had" and "until ...past tense"? I guess
0
Hi guys,

I had to wait until it had stopped biting.



I had to wait until it stopped biting.

If there's any difference between the two sentences, could you tell me please?
Both of these sound natual to me. I don't feel any real difference when I read them, although I think your discussion about small delays is on the right track.

B
0
Thanks, Clive. One less worry. Sorry, LiJ for making a fuss.

Related Questions