"I wouldn't consult you, if I didn't know that you were a doctor." This is definitely an unreal conditional sentence talking about the present. But I feel that this sentence can convey two different meanings. 1. I know that you are a doctor, that's why I am consulting you. 2. I know that you were a doctor in the past, that's why I am consulting you. Which is the right interpretation of this sentence ?
Top answer
#1.
— Mister Micawber
#1.
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
But if you need a sentence to convey meaning #2, try this.
"I wouldn't consult you, if I didn't know that you had been a doctor." But this is a bit ambiguous too. It treats "being a doctor" as (an) experience. So, borrowing a rule for reported speech