0
New2grammar Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

under the conservatorship

*71*0 01p

00Ingham told the court afterward that Spears' medical condition is "fluid" because her treatment is changing.02p

01p

00Spears' probate case is scheduled to go to trial July 31, but Ingham said it could be "harmful" for her to participate. Goetz agreed and said Spears' diagnosis is not complete. 02p

01p

00The 26-year-old singer and her 01b00estate02b00 have been 01b00under the conservatorship02b00 of her father for four months02p

01p

00What does this mean? He father is the temporary owner of her fortune? Does estate here mean Spears' house?02p

01p

00Thanks!02p

00 0-
  

Top answer

" 02br 00Not sure it's the same in the USA, but in my country when one is judged to be 01i 00incompetent02i 00* (by a court) and unable to look after his/her possessions, someone else is appointed (by the same court) to protect his/her interests. This person is usually a relative; sometimes, it can be a lawyer. 02br 00Anyway, those properties would still be owned by the "incompetent".

  • " 02br 00Not sure it's the same in the USA, but in my country when one is judged to be 01i 00incompetent02i 00* (by a court) and unable to look after his/her possessions, someone else is appointed (by the same court) to protect his/her interests.
  • This person is usually a relative; sometimes, it can be a lawyer.
  • 02br 00Anyway, those properties would still be owned by the "incompetent".
  • I mean, the conservator would not be allowed, say, to sell some of the properties he should protect and keep the money for himself.
  • 02br 00--------------02br 00* Examples of "01i 00incompetents02i 00" in my country: underage heirs, mentally ill people.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

14 Answers
0
0 Hi02br
02br
00I think he's responsible for the protection of her properties, rather than a "temporary owner." 02br
00Not sure it's the same in the USA, but in my country when one is judged to be 01i00incompetent02i00* (by a court) and unable to look after his/her possessions, someone else is appointed (by the same court) to protect his/her
0
0Could you give an example? I mean under what circumstances a person is deemed to be incapable of protecting his/her own interests? Disability?0-
0
0 Hi,02br
02br
00As I said earlier, underage heirs and mentally ill people would be the most common 01i00"incompetent02i00s" in my country. Physical disabilities are not an issue.02br
02br
00A 5-year-old orphan cannot protect his properties (let alone his life) without an adult, can he, especially if he's just inherited a huge fortun
0
0I'm sorry for missing out your footnote. Thanks, Tanit.02br
02br
00 By the way, I've always thought (the subject after let alone is usually less serious than before)02br
02br
00That uneducated can't even read, let alone pass the exam.02br
02br
00He can't even afford to pay for his food, let alone an apartment.02br
02br
0
0 That's an interesting point, and I must admit I've always used "01i00let alone02i00" intuitively (that's probably because we have a very similar expression in my language), so I'm not aware of any rule about it.02br
02br
00As for your two examples, I agree with you:02br
02br
01i00That uneducated can't even read, let alone pa
0
0You might want to create a new thread just to be sure you get an answer. Or you can wait for a while before doing that. 050010id1
0
0 Hi N2G,02br
02br
00I've been thinking about this for a while now. 05001blockquote
01cite10New2grammar12cite10By the way, I've always thought (the subject after let alone is usually less serious than before)12blockquote
10My idea is that it should work the other way around. It seems to work with all the three
0
0Actually we're in agreement. Maybe my wording is confusing to you. 02br
02br
00I used the word 'serious', not 'difficult'. It's funny that they would reverse the relationship. 02br
02br
01i001. That uneducated can't even read, let alone pass the exam02i00. >> ... 00to pass an exam is more difficult than to read00...02br
0
1blockquote
01cite10New2grammar12cite10Actually we're in agreement. Maybe my wording is confusing to you. 12br
12br
10I used the word 'serious', not 'difficult'. It's funny that they would reverse the relationship.12br
12blockquote
10If we are in agreement, why did this began in the first place? 05002b
0
0I meant we're in agreement regarding the rule for let alone, except your example which, I think, violates the rule if there's such a rule. 02br
02br
00<EDIT>02br
02br
00"01b00My idea is that it should work the other way around02b00. It seems to work with all the three examples we've got in this thread:"02br
02br

Related Questions