Type of usage/restrictive non restrictive.
Karen has braved having her hair cut short for Cancer research, in honour of two people close to her.
Karen has braved having her hair cut short for Cancer research in honour of two people close to her.
What is the difference between using the comma before 'in honour'? It's a non restrictive part of the sentence but is this usage at the writers discretion or is the comma always needed?
What is, is. So just deal with it.
Can this hold together as a sentence. Are there any instances where a phrase can stand alone (perhaps for effect) or do they always have to be connected in some way to the rest of the sentence?
Top answer
1. Karen has braved having her hair cut short for Cancer research , in honour of two people close to her. The comma in the above sentence is incorrect.
- 1.
- Karen has braved having her hair cut short for Cancer research , in honour of two people close to her.
- The comma in the above sentence is incorrect.
- Additionally, "cancer" should not be capitalized.
- The sentence seems to have another problem.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1. Karen has braved having her hair cut short for Cancer research, in honour of two people close to her.
The comma in the above sentence is incorrect. Additionally, "cancer" should not be capitalized.
The sentence seems to have another problem. I don't think she had her hair cut "for" cancer research. Pr
0
Related Questions