Type of usage
1. Our team have worked with two local groups, challenging them on art and knowledge.
2.Deconstructing the works themes of excess and revelry, we’ve worked with two local youth groups to design their own interpretation of the work.
Is there a term for the way challenging directly relates to the word/referent groups which is next to it, versus the way the other example's deconstructing refers to something mentioned later in the sentence?
Can most of these types of examples be switched around and retain the same meaning?
Top answer
panda blue 483 Is there a term for the way challenging directly relates to the word/referent groups which is next to it No. The problem is that "challenging" goes with the subject "our team", not with "local groups" because it's the team that's doing the challenging. panda blue 483 versus the way the other example's deconstructing refers to something mentioned later in the sentence?
- panda blue 483 Is there a term for the way challenging directly relates to the word/referent groups which is next to it No.
- The problem is that "challenging" goes with the subject "our team", not with "local groups" because it's the team that's doing the challenging.
- panda blue 483 versus the way the other example's deconstructing refers to something mentioned later in the sentence?
- Both cases are examples of participle clauses, and they can often go at the beginning or at the end of the main clause.
- I don't know of any rule that says they have to be in one position or another.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
panda blue 483Is there a term for the way challenging directly relates to the word/referent groups which is next to it
No. The problem is that "challenging" goes with the subject "our team", not with "local groups" because it's the team that's doing the challenging.
panda blue 483versus the way the other example's deconstructing
0
Related Questions