0
New2grammar Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

type 2 or 3

A lawyer is questioning a sex abused child.

Lawyer: What would happen to you if you wouldn't dance in this room?

Child: I wouldn't get fed and Booger Red would hang me.

1. Is the use of would hypothetical (Type 2 Conditional) in the lawyer's question? If so, could we use (Type 3 conditional - would have happened...you wouldn't have danced)

2. Is would in the child's statement the past of will?
Thanks in advance.
  

Top answer

you wouldn't have danced [only for the past 2) No, it's a conditional/hypothetical device,

  • you wouldn't have danced [only for the past 2) No, it's a conditional/hypothetical device,
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

7 Answers
0
1) hypothetical in present/future
would have happened...you wouldn't have danced [only for the past

2) No, it's a conditional/hypothetical device,
0
New2grammarLawyer: What would happen to you if you wouldn't dance in this room?
Can I say "What would happen to you if you DIDN'T dance in this room?"? If it's OK, what's the difference?
0
"What would happen to you if you DIDN'T dance in this room?"
This is better, in fact. Some sources frown at would/should after if, i.e. in the condition.
47 on "if you didn't dance"
0 on "if you wouldn't dance"
0
New2grammarLawyer: What would happen to you if you wouldn't dance in this room?

Child: I wouldn't get fed and Booger Red would hang me.

1. Is the use of would hypothetical (Type 2 Conditional) in the lawyer's question?
No, nor is it hypothetical in the child's response -- or perhaps it's semi-hypothetical. The situation suggests that the re
0
CJ. So, basically the question brought readers back to a point in the past where abuse was still taking place. It seems like it's very similar to the category you called "detective tense"?

"If he did kill the woman, he would have ...."

Thanks.

Related Questions