Oh, never mind. I did a little investigating online and found out that the second way is right when referring to the possession of separate items, not the same one.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1. It was Don and Craig's idea.Although 2. seems to be more sensible, the powers that be have decided that 1. is correct for joint possession. But that can lead to confusion, as in rhe example below.
2. It was Don's and Craig's idea.
Snarf.....Is this correct if the two people spoken of ownthe samea car together? yes
"the same car" can mean 'the same kind' of car.
It is his and Bob's car.
What do the powers that be say about that?
SnarfOh, never mind. I did a little investigating online and found out that the second way is right when referring to the possession of separate items, not the same one.Only if we use a plural: They were Dons' and Craig's ideas.
canadian45It is his and Bob's car.What do the powers that be say about that? I don't think we have to ask them, because the meaning is very clear.Okay, good, then, so we don't write "It is he and Bob's car," whether they own the car together or not. We use "his," correct?
fivejedjonOnly if we use a plural: They were Dons' and Craig's ideas.Hi. Can we instead use commas, It was Don's, and Craig's, idea?
Snarf... we don't write "It is he and Bob's car," whether they own the car together or not. We use "his," correct?That is correct.
Surfer Can we instead use commas, It was Don's, and Craig's, idea?Thank you.If we do, we are separating and Craig's from the rest of the sentences as if with brackets. It makes these words almost an afterthought.
fivejedjon Snarf... we don't write "It is he and Bob's car," whether they own the car together or not. We use "his," correct?That is correct.Interesting. Let's try an example without "It is" and see what happens: