0
Usenet Posted 22 years ago
Usage
Two meanings of pedophile & M Jackson.
"Pedophile" means lover of children.
And Michael Jackson does love children apart from any sexual attraction. He loves to make them happy and be constantly in their company. He doesn't have any adult relationships his only close relationships are with young boys. Remember how he was really in love with MacCauley Calkins and
that AIDS kid Ryan White?
So is he also a pedophile in terms of 288 of the California penal code touching meant to arouse? Yes, he was almost doing it on the air with Gavin.
And it is only "normal" (or inevitable) to want to touch a person you are in love with (as distinct from a blood relative whom you "love") and get sexual pleasure.
Of course Michael is just a big kid so it's really only like a lot of *** boys playing grabass or wrestling. (of course the DA in Santa Barbara is taking the literal view and sees this as an adult doing bad stuff)
And Michael Jackson does love children apart from any sexual attraction. He loves to make them happy and be constantly in their company. He doesn't have any adult relationships his only close relationships are with young boys. Remember how he was really in love with MacCauley Calkins and
that AIDS kid Ryan White?
So is he also a pedophile in terms of 288 of the California penal code touching meant to arouse? Yes, he was almost doing it on the air with Gavin.
And it is only "normal" (or inevitable) to want to touch a person you are in love with (as distinct from a blood relative whom you "love") and get sexual pleasure.
Of course Michael is just a big kid so it's really only like a lot of *** boys playing grabass or wrestling. (of course the DA in Santa Barbara is taking the literal view and sees this as an adult doing bad stuff)
Top answer
And paedophilia is a mental disorder. [nq:1]And Michael Jackson does love children apart from any sexual attraction. He loves to make them happy and be constantly ...
- And paedophilia is a mental disorder.
- [nq:1]And Michael Jackson does love children apart from any sexual attraction.
- He loves to make them happy and be constantly ...
- Ryan White?
- [/nq] I dont believe there is a penal code in any civilized country that incriminates paedophilia per se.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
33 Answers
0
And paedophilia is a mental disorder.
[nq:1]And Michael Jackson does love children apart from any sexual attraction. He loves to make them happy and be constantly ... Ryan White? So is he also a pedophile in terms of 288 of the California penal code touching meant to arouse?[/nq]
I dont believe there is a penal code in any civilized country that incriminates paedophilia per se.
[nq:1]Y
[nq:1]And Michael Jackson does love children apart from any sexual attraction. He loves to make them happy and be constantly ... Ryan White? So is he also a pedophile in terms of 288 of the California penal code touching meant to arouse?[/nq]
I dont believe there is a penal code in any civilized country that incriminates paedophilia per se.
[nq:1]Y
00
[nq:1]And paedophilia is a mental disorder.[/nq]
And people who commit crimes under the compulsion of a mental order are treated for the disorder usually in confinement until they recover (if they ever do).
[nq:2]And Michael Jackson does love children apart from any sexual attraction.[/nq]
How can you tell>
[nq:2]He loves to make them happy and be constantly in their company.[/n
And people who commit crimes under the compulsion of a mental order are treated for the disorder usually in confinement until they recover (if they ever do).
[nq:2]And Michael Jackson does love children apart from any sexual attraction.[/nq]
How can you tell>
[nq:2]He loves to make them happy and be constantly in their company.[/n
00
[nq:1]"Pedophile" means lover of children. And Michael Jackson does love children apart from any sexual attraction. He loves to make ... course the DA in Santa Barbara is taking the literal view and sees this as an adult doing bad stuff)[/nq]
See the latest South Park.
See the latest South Park.
00
[nq:1]But I do think it appropriate to criminalize *** offenses involving children. If someone's mental condition is such that ... be confined for his own protection and the protection of potential victims. Is that where Michael Jackson should wind up?[/nq]
Yes, if he is a pedophiliac. For the protections you mentioned above.
[nq:1]Is it where he will wind up? It's not as if you get to go
Yes, if he is a pedophiliac. For the protections you mentioned above.
[nq:1]Is it where he will wind up? It's not as if you get to go
00
[nq:1]It does seem worth pointing out that children at the receiving end of sexual encounters with adults are indeed victims.[/nq]
Have you ever been approached by a 14-year-old who put his hand down the front of your pants and said "I want that in me"? I have.
If I grant his request, is the kid a victim? Am I a criminal?
At what age does a "child" become an "adult" when it c
Have you ever been approached by a 14-year-old who put his hand down the front of your pants and said "I want that in me"? I have.
If I grant his request, is the kid a victim? Am I a criminal?
At what age does a "child" become an "adult" when it c
00
[nq:2]It does seem worth pointing out that children at the receiving end of sexual encounters with adults are indeed victims.[/nq]
[nq:1]Have you ever been approached by a 14-year-old who put his hand down the front of your pants and said "I want that in me"? I have.[/nq]
I don't envy you.
[nq:1]If I grant his request, is the kid a victim? Am I a criminal?[/nq]
Yes. Yes.
[nq:1]
[nq:1]Have you ever been approached by a 14-year-old who put his hand down the front of your pants and said "I want that in me"? I have.[/nq]
I don't envy you.
[nq:1]If I grant his request, is the kid a victim? Am I a criminal?[/nq]
Yes. Yes.
[nq:1]
00
Gary G. Taylor wrote on 24 Apr 2004:
[nq:2]It does seem worth pointing out that children at the receiving end of sexual encounters with adults are indeed victims.[/nq]
[nq:1]Have you ever been approached by a 14-year-old who put his hand down the front of your pants and said "I want that in me"? I have. If I grant his request, is the kid a victim? Am I a criminal?[/nq]
Yes and yes, if
[nq:2]It does seem worth pointing out that children at the receiving end of sexual encounters with adults are indeed victims.[/nq]
[nq:1]Have you ever been approached by a 14-year-old who put his hand down the front of your pants and said "I want that in me"? I have. If I grant his request, is the kid a victim? Am I a criminal?[/nq]
Yes and yes, if
00
[nq:1]You'd better make **** sure you never get convicted of exercising the beliefs you've expressed here. Regardless of the validity ... squashed, and debauched (if your prisonmates can stand the idea of even touching you except to kill you) in prison[/nq]
Yes, I know; I already have been. Read my web site.
Gary G. Taylor * Rialto, CA
gary at donavan dot org / http:// geetee dot
Yes, I know; I already have been. Read my web site.
Gary G. Taylor * Rialto, CA
gary at donavan dot org / http:// geetee dot
00
[nq:2]Have you ever been approached by a 14-year-old who put ... request, is the kid a victim? Am I a criminal?[/nq]
[nq:1]Yes and yes, if you're older than 15 or 16. And if you're older than 18 and believe that it's ... the come-ons of minors as reasonable and competent invitations for consensual adult sexual relationships, then you are judgmentally impaired, IMHO[/nq]
Remember when you f
[nq:1]Yes and yes, if you're older than 15 or 16. And if you're older than 18 and believe that it's ... the come-ons of minors as reasonable and competent invitations for consensual adult sexual relationships, then you are judgmentally impaired, IMHO[/nq]
Remember when you f
00
[nq:1]That is, a 14 year old who approaches a grown man and asks for *** is already pre programmed that way.[/nq]
Not only that, but almost certainly experienced as well. That was my point in positing the original question.
Gary G. Taylor * Rialto, CA
gary at donavan dot org / http:// geetee dot donavan dot org "The two most abundant things in the universe
are hydrogen and st
Not only that, but almost certainly experienced as well. That was my point in positing the original question.
Gary G. Taylor * Rialto, CA
gary at donavan dot org / http:// geetee dot donavan dot org "The two most abundant things in the universe
are hydrogen and st
0
Related Questions