0
Samurai33 Posted 17 years ago
Grammar

"two is"

below is a quote from Derek Cooper

"One whiskey is all right; two is too much; three is too few."

Can anyone explain why it is "two is; three is" instead of "two are; three are"?

thanks!
  

Top answer

Hello samurai, and welcome to English Forums. The writer could have used 'are' but 'is' indicates that s/he is thinking of a single quantity rather than a number of units.

  • Hello samurai, and welcome to English Forums.
  • The writer could have used 'are' but 'is' indicates that s/he is thinking of a single quantity rather than a number of units.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
.
Hello samurai, and welcome to English Forums.

The writer could have used 'are' but 'is' indicates that s/he is thinking of a single quantity rather than a number of units.
.
0
The nouns to which the "is" is referring to, are all singular compound nouns, hence the use of the singular verb "is".
"two", "three", etc are compound nouns in the singular.
Same as other compound singular nouns like crowd, flock (of birds), school (of fish), group,

You can talk of these in the plural, eg crowds, flocks, etc, and also twos, threes, and fours.
Then they tak
0
.
Could you give us your definition of 'compound noun', Jeannie?
.
0
I think of it like an adjusting lever, or ****. "Two clicks is not enough." "Four turns is way too much." (That is, too much adjustment.)

Edit. Hmm. I'm running into an antecedent problem here. Not the compound noun.
0
Thanks for the pick-up. I meant collective nouns.
"A collective noun denotes a collections of groups of individuals" as per the examples I gave.
In some collective nouns the idea of the singleness, the unity of the group, is uppermost, and these works are always regards as singular. They require the singular form of the verb."
"Though the collective noun is singular and ought to tak

Related Questions