0
Vincent Teo Posted 18 years ago
Grammar

took him out to (the) sea

Is there a natural way to say:

(i) John's father took him out (to the sea) in the fishing boat.

(ii) John's father took him out (to sea) in the fishing boat.
  

Top answer

(ii) John's father took him out to sea in the fishing boat.

  • (ii) John's father took him out to sea in the fishing boat.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

6 Answers
0
.
(ii) John's father took him out to sea in the fishing boat.
.
0
Thanks.

I got a problem. Why do we leave out "the" in the sentence given?

Can I say;

(ii) John's father took him to sea in the fishing boat.
0
.
Yes, 'at sea, to sea' are idiomatic in the way that 'at home' and 'to work' are.
.
0
Vincent Teo(i) John's father took him out (to the sea) in the fishing boat.

As neither John nor his father is a sailor, I see nothing wrong with the above sentence.However, you would have to say: He went out to sea at the age of 17 if you were talking about a sailor. The is commonly used with sea when the life of sailors is not
0
.
This is the first time I have disagreed with CB, I think-- or at least the first time in a long time. I cannot see that their occupations make any difference. If you were, in an unlikely scenario, taken out to the sea, it would have to mean that you were not at the moment on/on/at or anywhere near (because of 'out') the sea in question. But these folks are on the boat, whi
0
Mister Micawber.
This is the first time I have disagreed with CB, I think-- or at least the first time in a long time. I cannot see that their occupations make any difference.
Hi Mr M
I was a little rash, even though I do think leaving out the article before sea very often means seafaring is involved. Not necessarily, though. Being a sailor isn

Related Questions