0We saw some poor people who had lost their arms or legs 01u00because of/to02u00 the bombs.02br 02br 00Which sounds better here, because of or to? Is it possible that both fit? Thanks.02br 02br 05000 030srchttp://forum.wordreference.com/images/misc/progress.gif
Top answer
02br 02br 00Which sounds better here, because of or to? Is it possible that both fit? 02font 00Both are correct.
— Clive
02br 02br 00Which sounds better here, because of or to?
Is it possible that both fit?
02font 00Both are correct.
02br 02br 00Best wishes, Clive0-
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0Hi,02br 02br 01font00We saw some poor people who had lost their arms or legs 01u00because of/to02u00 the bombs.02br 02br 00Which sounds better here, because of or to? Is it possible that both fit? 02font00Both are correct. However, 'to' is more formal, more literary, and less common.02br