Hello, everyone!!
As far as I understand, in informal style we often use ‘where’ to introduce defining relative clauses instead of ‘at/on/in which’ only. However, I’m confused to have found following two contradictory answers about the same usage; “to which vs. where”.
1. “The shop where he went” is OK, or you can retain the unnecessary preposition and leave off the relative pronoun: “the shop he went to”. But “the shop where he went to” is too much. – American English, retired professor (linguist)
https://english.stackexchange.com/questions/503355/to-which-where
2.
[Q] It's the shop ............. . [according to the meaning in 'I went in the shop yesterday.']
I wonder whether the following three made up by me are all ok?;
A. that I went to yesterday.
B. to which I went yesterday.
C. where I went yesterday.
= =
[A]
A. is ok
B. is ok, but quite formal.
C. is incorrect, but I think people do say this occasionally.
You can also hear: D. which I went to yesterday / British
https://forum.wordreference.com/threads/to-which-where.1147530/
While I’m also inclined to feel above C. is incorrect, would anyone kindly clarify this grammatical usage? Since the natives' answers aren't agreed in one way, is it impossible to find the general rule to cover all cases of the replacement 'preposition+which' with 'where'?
Thanking for your usual helps and RGDS,
Hi 1. The first two are good: the shop where he went / the shop he went to. You've uncovered an interesting question there: [X] The shop where he went to.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Hi
1. The first two are good: the shop where he went / the shop he went to.
You've uncovered an interesting question there:
[X] The shop where he went to.
[v] The shop that he went to.
The first is wrong, the second is OK. I have to say, I don't know why - perhaps another contributor can explain that.
2. All are OK to my ear.
- This is the shop wher