"The purge has effectively destroyed Grace Mugabe’s “G40” faction within the party, and underlines the degree to which Mugabe’s overthrow has been driven as much by competition for power within the Zanu-PF as popular anger at a dictatorial and corrupt regime." (The Guardian.)
Is to which Mugabe’s overthrow has been driven as much by competition for power within the Zanu-PF as popular anger at a dictatorial and corrupt regime a relative clause or is it a prepositional phrase in the sentence above?
The purge has effectively destroyed Grace Mugabe’s “G40” faction within the party, and underlines the degree i [ to which i ] j Mugabe’s overthrow has been driven _____ j as much by competition for power within the Zanu-PF as popular anger at a dictatorial and corrupt regime ] . No, not a PP but a relative clause which contains a fronted PP. The PP consists of "to" +"which", but it is just the relative pronoun "which" that has "degree" as antecedent.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
The purge has effectively destroyed Grace Mugabe’s “G40” faction within the party, and underlines the degreei [to whichi]j Mugabe’s overthrow has been driven _____j as much by competition for power within the Zanu-PF as popular anger at a dictatorial and corrupt regime ].
No,