0
PECULIAR773 Posted 9 years ago
Grammar

To watch/watching

I watched the man. He bumped into a woman.

The passive form should be, according to an English professor, "The man was watched to bump into a woman"

It just sounds completely wrong, in my opinion. I'd go with "the man was watched bumping into / to have bumped a woman". I know that the active form doesn't have "he was bumping", so we can't say it was a continuous action, but still it makes far more sense than "watched to bump". Is this really the only acceptable option?

  

Top answer

PECULIAR773 The passive form should be, according to an English professor, "The man was watched to bump into a woman"It just sounds completely wrong, in my opinion Yes, wrong. Once again, the point of active <=> passive conversion exercises is shown to be moot. To make a reasonable native sentence, we need to do this: The man was seen bumping / to bump into a woman.

  • PECULIAR773 The passive form should be, according to an English professor, "The man was watched to bump into a woman"It just sounds completely wrong, in my opinion Yes, wrong.
  • Once again, the point of active <=> passive conversion exercises is shown to be moot.
  • To make a reasonable native sentence, we need to do this: The man was seen bumping / to bump into a woman.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

1 Answers
0
PECULIAR773The passive form should be, according to an English professor, "The man was watched to bump into a woman"It just sounds completely wrong, in my opinion

Yes, wrong. Once again, the point of active <=> passive conversion exercises is shown to be moot. To make a reasonable native sentence, we need to do this:

The man was seen bumpin

Related Questions