Both sound all right to my ear. A British guide to prepositions only offers to , though. CB
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AnonymousWhat books can you recommend to/for me?Both are acceptable, but let me add a comment. The indirect object to me / for me is very frequently omitted with the verb recommend. The following is enough:
What shoes can you recommend for/to me?
Are both to and for acceptable?
AnonymousWhat books can you recommend to/for me?
What shoes can you recommend for/to me?
Are both to and for acceptable
What books/shoes can you recommend to me? - sounds to me like a plain question in which I'm expecting the other person to recommend something based on their own preference.
What books/shoes can you recommend
Ant_222is the preposition necessary at all?Yes. I believe you have to have a preposition. recommend me implies recommend me (my services, my talent) to someone else.
CalifJimI believe you have to have a preposition.I was sure this case was the same as with "to give" and the position of the direct and indirect objects:
Ant_222Now that my understanding is lost, could you tell me if this question is covered by grammar books and what the subject is called?See
CalifJimSee Re: Ditransitive Verb (Sentence formation)This answers my question
Ant_222I wonder why even "learner's" dictionaries do not provide this informationWell, you can't put everything in onebook! How would all the other writers make a living?