Yes, that's right: they have given two meanings-- either spread thinly or spread wastefully. Your two other sentences are both in use.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Mister Micawberthey have given two meaningsBut they shouldn't have combined two completely different meanings under one definition. Do you okay such a practice?
Mister MicawberThe problem is that you don't understand as much English as you pretend to.Mr Micawber, I don't know why you think so about me. I have never pretended this. I'm a learner and when I request you to help me I simply acknoledge your higher authority. I was not questioning the dictionary's entries - it was something I was having difficulty with. A
Mister Micawber Have you ever considered why I never use emoticons? Because they can be just as deceptive as a smile or a promise.Somehow, I suspect you occasionally smile.
AvangiAre you suggesting that this is inconsistent with their common practice of listing contrasting meanings with separate numbers, as 1., 2., etc.?Yes, this is what I was saying, or rather was trying to. Usually M-W lists cntrasting definitions or where meanings are quite dissimilar separately. I admit I shouldn't have edited the original entry to "/". Sorr