*To present sb with sth

0 present somebody with something, usually to accuse or criticize; "We confronted him with the evidence" 02br
02br
00Is this the meaning you want? 0-

0'Present' takes 'to' if 'you' is the recipient; otherwise, 'you' would be the object. The choices: 02br
02br
00I want to present an award to you. (= give) 02br
00I want to present you to Pope Benedict XVI. (= introduce) 02br
00I want to present you with an award. (= give) 02br
02br
00As you can imagine, 'I want to present you Pope

0 By 'present' I meant "to show" or something like that. 02br
02br
00What do you think about my examples? 02br
001) 02br
00a)I want to present you the results of my findings. 02br
00Should it be? 02br
00b)I want to present the results of my findings to you. 02br
02br
002) 02br
00I want to present

0Ah, I see. #1b in this case means to me 'make a presentation of' or 'show' the findings ('results of the findings' seems redundant, by the way; 'results' = 'findings'), while #2 seems more to suggest a 'gift' or 'submission' of the findings. Not a big difference in this instance, but perhaps significantly different in other cases. 02br
02br
00#1a is certainly intelligible,

0 thank you Mister Micawber, 02br
02br
00I have one more question that I hope will clear my doubts. 02br
00Could you please tell me when the difference between 'present sb with sth' and 'present sth to sb' is significant? ( in which other cases) 02br
02br
00Could you give any examples or maybe some general information on when to use which of th

0Well, Yogi, my brain and other current resources do not come up with a clear answer for this. 02br
02br
00Creating hypothetical sentences in my head produces the feeling that (when 'present sb with sth' and 'present sth to sb' mean 'show' or 'give') the latter suggests the more straightforward action from giver to receiver, where the former suggests a sort of 01i00