00 When we consider how it is that music can express emotion-11del12br10the question of what makes it possible for music to be sad, anguished, joyous and so forth12del10-a sort of intellectual darkness descends on us. For, in describing a piece of music in such terms, it is not meant that on listening to it we have become sad or anguished or joyous, nor that the composer had such feelings and intended to communicate them by musical means. In grasping what music express we do not characteristically take up 11b10 any of the other 12b10 attitudes which are the usual corollaries of having an emotion, but the emotion that music express is nevertheless in some sense felt, rather than merely known of. 12blockquote
0 Hello Taka 02br 02br 00I would interpret this as follows: 02br 02br 001. g. emotion A.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
00 I would agree that 'other' is a mistake. 12blockquote12br
00 a) X, Y, Z are attitudes; 12br
10b) Emotion A, which they accompany, is also an att
00...any of the other attitudes which are the usual corollaries of having an emotion...12blockquote12br
00 b) Emotion A ] i.e. the emotion referred to in 'having an emotion' 12br
12br
10which they ] i.e. X, Y, Z, which are the 'usual corollaries' 12br
12br
10accompany, is also an attitude ] 'also an attitu
00...any of the other attitudes which are the usual corollaries of having an emotion...12blockquote12br
00 In context, however, the only referent for W is emotion A. 12blockquote12br
00 So the writer seems to think that emotion A 11b10 both 12b10 has accompanying attitudes, i.e. XY
00 Even then, I would struggle to make sense of the sentence as it stands, since a 'listening attitude' is not a 'usual corollary' of 'having an emotion' 12blockquote12br
00 Out of interest, where did you find this extract? 12blockquote1