Jackson6612 Which one to use where between 'for me' and 'to me'? Most people use them interchangeably. "To me," is like, "To my way of thinking," As an introductory phrase, it simply stresses that the thing may be different to/for you than to/for someone else.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
Jackson6612Which one to use where between 'for me' and 'to me'?Most people use them interchangeably. "To me," is like, "To my way of thinking,"
AvangiFor me, it's a little dose of poison in disguise.
Why? Don't you like sweets?
Well, who wouldn't. I have diabetes.
In your dialogue, the natural phrase would be "Well, who would?" (under these circumstances)
Who would in my situation? I have etc.
You'd use "Who wouldn't? in reply to a "Do you . .
Jackson6612Would that work?Yes.
Well who wouldn't (like sweets). But I have diabetes.
AvangiThe trick is that "reply" can be countable and uncountable.How can a 'reply' be a countable and uncountable noun? To me, it's countable - single reply.
In answer to your question, you may not. . In an answer to my question, I found the following:
Jackson6612In an answer to my question, I found the following:It's about as subtle as a sharp stick in the eye.
Is there any difference in meaning between the bold phrases, no matter how suble?