0
Abbie1948 Posted 21 years ago
Linguistics Studies

To italicise or not to italicise

0 Fowler states that it is 01b00customary02b00 to italicise "non-naturalised words" to warn the reader that something unusual is coming. (!) 02br
02br
00At what point do we decide whether a word or phrase has become "naturalised"? It has been suggested to me that I 01b00must02b00 italicise 'de facto', but it seems to me that this is used so frequently that it is may be counted as "naturalised". 02br
02br
00What about "referrendum"? It is "naturalised" if you use the plural "referrendums", but counts as non-naturalised if you use the plural "referrenda". Should I then write 01i00referrendum02i00 to indicate that I prefer the plural 01i00referrenda02i02br
02br
00As it is a "custom", is it really necessary to get one's knickers in a twist?05002br
010id8
  

Top answer

0I let the lexicographers do the naturalizing, Abbie. I guide myself on whether the word is in the main body of the dictionary (and is therefore a word accepted into English), or in the back section of 'Foreign Words and Phrases'. ).

  • 0I let the lexicographers do the naturalizing, Abbie.
  • I guide myself on whether the word is in the main body of the dictionary (and is therefore a word accepted into English), or in the back section of 'Foreign Words and Phrases'.
  • ).
  • 02br 02br 00Bottom line: I would suggest doing what raises the fewest eyebrows among your readership, as you want them to hang on your meaning, not on your typography.
  • Personally, I would consider unnecessary italicization pedantic-- if I can I use that word without offense here.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

2 Answers
0
0I let the lexicographers do the naturalizing, Abbie. I guide myself on whether the word is in the main body of the dictionary (and is therefore a word accepted into English), or in the back section of 'Foreign Words and Phrases'. 02br
02br
00According to 01i00Webster's Collegiate02i00, 'de facto' has been in the language since the early 1600s, while '
0
0 It was actually in a letter, Mr.M, and I could have been cross! Raise eyebrows? The thought of a sharp pencil came to mind!! 02br
02br
00Thank you for your response; I shall continue using it as I have always done - sans itallics. I think it's a bit patronising to "warn" people that I'm going to use it. 02br
02br
00"Look out - here comes a big word whi

Related Questions