what is the difference among the following sentences with regard to meaning? what does each sentence mean to you (?)? - are they correct anyway - special attention to the punctuation and the use of the 'to be to' grammatical structure?
i cleaned the whole house - that was to have been done. i cleaned the whole house - that was to be done.
i cleaned the whole house; it was to have been done. i cleaned the whole house - it was to have been done. i cleaned the whole house. it was to have been done. i cleaned the whole house, it was to have been done.
what are the differences among the following three things? what is the difference among the following three things? which sentence would you use? are they both correct?
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1st question: do you know the answer? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ thank you!
inchoate
Top answer
Hi, 2nd question: All of these sound very odd. You need to say I cleaned the whole house. It had to be done.
— Clive
Hi, 2nd question: All of these sound very odd.
You need to say I cleaned the whole house.
It had to be done.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3rd question: what are the differences among the following three things?
what is the difference among the following three things?
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.