0
Qim Posted 20 years ago
Vocabulary

To be shocked

Is it correct to say:

I was shocked to learn that...

or is it better:

I was shocked when I learned that...

??
  

Top answer

1st is better, IMO

  • 1st is better, IMO
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
To elaborate on the previous answer.

"I was shocked to learn that ..." implies that the learning caused the shocking. The second form is more general. It could just be stating the writer's condition at the time of the learning, as in "I was drunk when I voted for Nixon".
0
I disagree with Jrdavis. Certainly in the case of "drunk" I agree, because you cannot be drunk as a result of voting for Nixon, but with "shocked" I think it's an improbable interpretation. I'd say the two sentences are equally correct, but "shocked to learn" is more concise and more common.
0
Ah, so sorry, but I was too brief in my posting. When I said "the second form is more general" I was talking about it in its general form, ("I was x when y"), which does allow both the causal (y caused x) and the stative (I was in the state/condition of x when y occurred) readings.

I think we agree that this form, in general, allows for both rea

Related Questions