0
Anonymous Posted 17 years ago
Grammar

To be sent or to sent

Hi. I get confused whenever I see this kind of sentences. How would I know if one is incorrect and the other is correct?

You should remit the sum to be sent (to send?) to the accounting officer.
  

Top answer

In this sentence, to be sent is the correct form. is enough.

  • In this sentence, to be sent is the correct form.
  • is enough.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

4 Answers
0
In this sentence, to be sent is the correct form. However, it is not necessary: "remit the sum to the"......is enough.
0
Anonymous How would I know if one is incorrect and the other is correct?
The grammatical voice - active or passive - makes all the difference. (English wouldn't be English if there were no exceptions!)
You should read the books [which/that are supposed] to be read by next week.
The books cannot read. They won't do the reading. Someone
0
Thank you. Very helpful.

You wrote:

You should read the books [which/that are supposed] to be read by next week.

Whenever I see this kind of sentence ( or some sentence that has a pattern similar to this), I feel what is ellipted has to be in the form of "what/that is and are" and what you seem to be have as the part left out (and thus optional) is "which/that are
0
AnonymousCould we have thopught the part left out to be this?

You should read the books [which/that are] to be read by next week.
Yes, but including supposed is more common, especially in spoken English. Leaving it out may make the sentence sound unnatural. Another example:
He was [supposed] to come yesterday, but for some re

Related Questions