0
Anonymous Posted 12 years ago
Grammar
To be or was
Granted, sustainability would not be achieved if only one, two, or three systems were sustainable, but could be if a vast proportion of known systems were to the extent that the evidence of sustainability was found in governmental data.
OR
Granted, sustainability would not be achieved if only one, two, or three systems were sustainable, but could be if a vast proportion of known systems were to the extent that the evidence of sustainability was to be found in governmental data.
OR
Granted, sustainability would not be achieved if only one, two, or three systems were sustainable, but could be if a vast proportion of known systems were to the extent that the evidence of sustainability was to be found in governmental data.
Top answer
Both are too convoluted. I am unsure what you mean, as the two sentences seem to say something different. — Granted, sustainability would not be achieved if only one, two, or three systems were sustainable, but could be if most known systems were sustainable according to governmental data.
- Both are too convoluted.
- I am unsure what you mean, as the two sentences seem to say something different.
- — Granted, sustainability would not be achieved if only one, two, or three systems were sustainable, but could be if most known systems were sustainable according to governmental data.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
Both are too convoluted. I am unsure what you mean, as the two sentences seem to say something different. Is it this?—
Granted, sustainability would not be achieved if only one, two, or three systems were sustainable, but could be if most known systems were sustainable according to governmental data.
Granted, sustainability would not be achieved if only one, two, or three systems were sustainable, but could be if most known systems were sustainable according to governmental data.
0
Related Questions