0
Jigneshbharati Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

To be cryogenically and London

14-year-old London schoolgirl wins bid to be cryogenically frozen so she can live again
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/14-year-old-london-schoolgirl-wins-bid-be-cryogenically-frozen-so-she-can-live-again-1592167
What is the grammatical function of "to be" here, how do we know that we need one and what does it modify or describe in the sentence? Is "London" an adjective modifying schoolgirl?
Thanks advance to all great people who are helping us to learn this beautiful language.
  

Top answer

"to be cryogenically frozen" modifies "bid" (describes what kind of bid it is). "London" is an attributive noun modifying "schoolgirl". Though it functions a bit like an adjective, it is not a true adjective.

  • "to be cryogenically frozen" modifies "bid" (describes what kind of bid it is).
  • "London" is an attributive noun modifying "schoolgirl".
  • Though it functions a bit like an adjective, it is not a true adjective.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

7 Answers
0
"to be cryogenically frozen" modifies "bid" (describes what kind of bid it is).

"London" is an attributive noun modifying "schoolgirl". Though it functions a bit like an adjective, it is not a true adjective.
0
is "to be" a verbal-infinitive?
0
Anonymous Is "to be" a verbal-infinitive?
It's an infinitive. Yes. But it's part of a larger infinitive, to be frozen. (You don't have to say 'verbal'; all infinitives are verb forms.)

to freeze is the active infinitive.
to be frozen is the passive infinitive.

CJ
0
Jigneshbharati14-year-old London schoolgirl wins bid to be cryogenically frozen so she can live again
Isn't "to be cryogenically frozen" an infinitive (non-finite) clause of purpose ([in order] to be cryogenically frozen)?
0
AnonymousIsn't "to be cryogenically frozen" an infinitive (non-finite) clause of purpose ([in order] to be cryogenically frozen)?
Excellent question, but I think not. It's a complement to "bid".

"bid" is a deverbal. To bid to do something doesn't sound to me exactly the same as to bid in order to do something. The former gives the con
0
Thank you, CJ, for the excellent reply.

PS: Indeed, The BBI Combinatory Dictionary includes the noun "bid" into the grammatical collocation "noun followed by to + infinitive" which doesn't express purpose. The authors of that dictionary write: "We don't include [in their dictionary] nouns if they are followed by infinitives normally associated with the whole sentence rather than wi
0
AnonymousIndeed, The BBI Combinatory Dictionary includes the noun "bid" ...
Thanks for the additional information. It's nice to know I'm not the only one who analyzes the pattern that way.

Related Questions