Does "to authority, whether that of tradition or that of revelation" mean "to authority, whether authority of tradition or authority of revelation"?<br/><br/>Context:<br/><br/>Philosophy, as I shall understand the word, is something intermediate <br/><br/>between theology and science. Like theology, it consists of speculations <br/><br/>on matters as to which definite knowledge has, so far, been un <br/><br/>ascertainable; but like science, it appeals to human reason rather than <br/><br/><b>to authority, whether that of tradition or that of revelation</b>. All definite <br/><br/>knowledge -- so I should contend - belongs to science; all dogma as to <br/><br/>what surpasses definite knowledge belongs to theology. But between <br/><br/>theology and science there is a No Man's Land, exposed to attack from <br/><br/>both sides; this No Man's Land is philosophy.