To attach a name to the producer of the work

Does the highlighted sentence imply "Nairne by defining the Docklands project specifically in the arena of art, on the other hand highlights the fact that every work of art has a specific producer, which in the case of Docklands project the producers are not only Leeson and Dunn but also the residents of that region"?

Text:

In short, Nairne identified a changing agenda for the production of art and recognised the diversity of the roles that it can play in an expanded field of practice. Commenting on the limitations of the conventional hierarchical organisation of the visual arts, Nairne stressed the artistic value of the Docklands project as an outstanding example of the inventive use of posters, borne out by other examples of this sort of work that Leeson and Dunn had produced for exhibitions in America and Canada and international magazines. However, while Nairne’s desire to classify the Docklands poster project as art can be seen as expanding or even democratising the remit of art by including popular forms, it still sets up a demarcation between advertising, propaganda and art. In his desire – or need – to hang on to the category of art, Nairne reflects the persistence of a related need: to attach a name to the producer of the work, which, in the case of the Docklands Community Project ought to have been the Docklands residents as much as Leeson and Dunn.