0When Leslie returned to England, her friends loved the idea and, 01i01b00giving (and not building02b02i00) up a promising career, she 01b01i00went into02i02b00 business producing it. 02br 02br 01b01i00The action02i02b00 the -ing V denotes 01b01i00takes place02i02b00 01b01i00earlier in time02i02b00.02br 02br 00This is why 01b01i00building02i02b00 is not okay above.02br 02br 00 I cannot give an explanation why it is a kind of unconditioned reflex to me when reading the sentence above.02br 02br 00---------02br 02br 00 Now take a look at the sentence below:02br 02br 00When Leslie returned to England, her friends loved the idea and she 01i01b00went into02b02i00 business producing it, 01b01i00building (or giving)02i02b00 up a promising career.02br 02br 00Here, 01b01i00building (or giving )takes place later than "went into" and the sentence has different meaning, although the same words are used as in the first sentence02i02b05002br 02br 00It seems to me that the time sequence of actions denoted by the verbs is dependent on where the -ing V is placed in the sentence.02br 02br 00Am I right?02br 02br 00Thanks010id3
Top answer
01i 02br 02i 0-
— Marius Hancu
01i 02br 02i 0-
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
0 Better, IMO:02br 02br 01i00When Leslie returned to England, her friends loved the idea and, 01font01i01b00giving up (and not building)02b02i02font00 a promising career, she 01b01i00went into02i02b00 business01font00, 02font
0 I don't find too much of a difference between your alternatives. The -ing form creates a paranthesis for a 01b00parallel02b00 process, not antecedent (if you don't have any "before", "after" around). 0-