0
Karol Silski Posted 7 years ago
Grammar

Time clause in Reported Speech

My book (FCE Use of English) says that the tenses do not change in Reported Speech when the reported sentence contains a time clause. And then we've got an example:


"The car broke down when I was driving to work," he said.

He said that the car had broken down when he was driving to work.


yet in another example, it goes at follows:

"I was locking the car when a traffic warden turned up," she said.

She said that when she was locking a traffic warden turned up.


Can you explain why in the first example the tense changed in the first part of the sentence despite the time clause ("when") in the sentence? Would the rule be that we don't change tenses only after the time clause?

  

Top answer

Karol Silski Y et in another example, it goes at follows: "I was locking the car when a traffic warden turned up," she said. She said that when she was locking a traffic warden turned up. Locking a traffic warden?

  • Karol Silski Y et in another example, it goes at follows: "I was locking the car when a traffic warden turned up," she said.
  • She said that when she was locking a traffic warden turned up.
  • Locking a traffic warden?
  • I think you need to post this again — correctly this time.
  • CJ
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

3 Answers
0
Karol SilskiYet in another example, it goes at follows:
"I was locking the car when a traffic warden turned up," she said.
She said that when she was locking a traffic warden turned up.

Locking a traffic warden?

I think you need to post this again — correctly this time.

CJ

0
Karol SilskiCan you explain why in the first example the tense changed in the first part of the sentence despite the time clause ("when") in the sentence?

Your book is wrong. Obviously the tense can change even when there's a time clause. I've never heard of such a rule.

You don't have to change the tense in that sentence, but there's no rule that s

0

I still hold that when two things happen in the past, we use a past perfect verb to distinguish which thing happened first. I think this rule should be applied in all the cases except when two things happen at the same time. Besides, some time conjuntions like ‘when ‘marks which thing happened first.

Example (1):I changed my dress when I reached home.. can be reported without changing t

Related Questions