0
Ecopsy Posted 17 years ago
Grammar

Three vague sentences plus one question in the question itself

1.Somehow this sort of traditional Hamlet aspect in the untraditional character he was playing didn't seem to fit together.

2.The people who want to play with the cards that have goods trains on have to sit here.

What do the itallicized parts mean? They seem vague to a foreigner like me.

3.That teapot the duke has given to my aunt.

Anyway, is it a sentence?

The context(s) of the three is(are) not given where they are adpated.

Should it(they) be context/contexts, is/are in the sentence above?

Thanks in advance.Emotion: smile
  

Top answer

Hi ecopsy, 1. This would work in the right context - describing a performance in the theater, for example. 2.

  • Hi ecopsy, 1.
  • This would work in the right context - describing a performance in the theater, for example.
  • 2.
  • " It would be a very unusual situation for this to make sense.
  • What makes a good train?
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
Hi ecopsy,

1. This would work in the right context - describing a performance in the theater, for example.

2. This doesn't make sense - good trains on THEM could work if there were, for example, playing cards with different designs on their backs, among which was a deck of cards with pictures of "good trains." It would be a very unusual situation for this to make sense. What ma
0
ecopsy1.Somehow this sort of traditional Hamlet aspect in the untraditional character he was playing didn't seem to fit together.
2.The people who want to play with the cards that have goods trains on have to sit here.

1) It is a very obtuse sentence. The reference "together" mentions only one thing - a feature in the character "H
0
Oh! I never saw that "S" in "goods train" - I thought it was a "good train" compared to a "bad train," I guess.

Thanks.
0
All the three sentences are from Halliday's 'An Introduction to Functional Grammar' for which he didn't provide any context.

I'd check the first sentence again to make sure I haven't spoiled it by typing errors.

Your interprataion of the second sentence makes sense.

And I didn't think the third is a sentence, and I'd hold to that after your explanation.

0
Thank you, Grammar Geek, really appreciate your help.Emotion: smile

Related Questions