0
Believer Posted 19 years ago
Grammar

three times or for three times

0Hi,02br
02br
00I have trouble using the phrases 'three times' and 'for three times' correctly. I arbitrary put the number 'three' there but it could be any number like 'four', 'five', etc. I think 'three times' can be replaced with 'thrice' but what I am concerned about are the usage of the word 'for' and the absence of it. Sometimes, the need to use it and not to use it can be hard to determine/decide.02br
02br
00He has read this novel three times.02br
02br
00Can it be?02br
02br
00He has read this novel for three times.02br
02br
00He has driven his car around Seoul five times.02br
02br
00Can it be?02br
02br
00He has driven his car around Seoul for five times. (I think this is not likely to be accepted but cannot give out the reason. Help.) 0-
  

Top answer

02br 02br 00Are you getting confused between this and time references; for X minutes, for X days, for X years? 0-

  • 02br 02br 00Are you getting confused between this and time references; for X minutes, for X days, for X years?
  • 0-
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
0I'm having trouble thinking of any examples when you would use 'for X times'.02br
02br
00Are you getting confused between this and time references; for X minutes, for X days, for X years? 'Times' (no of incidences of something) isn't the same as time - period that something happens.0-
0
0Thank you, Nona.02br
02br
00I was confusing the matter. Yes, I meant to ask about time references. In respect to various phrases making time references, when is it OK to use 'for X days/months/years' and just 'X days/months/years' interchangeably without making any discernable differences in meaning?02br
02br
00He was there for two years.02br
02
0
0 01blockquote
01cite10Believer12cite10I think 'three times' can be replaced with 'thrice' but what I am concerned about are the usage of the word 'for' and the absence of it. 12br
12br
10I don't think anyone uses 'thrice' anymore to be honest... Perhaps you could find some aspiring authors or aging academics who still use it, but I
0
0Thank you, Tam for that informative information. I will tentatively say tha some archaic usage of some phrases are better left unused.02br
02br
00Can you give me some tips that will help me distinguish the situations where "for + some time duration" is right and where just "some time duration without 'for'" is right? 0-
0
0 I'm curious to know too. Let's see what native speakers have to say. 0-

Related Questions