Well, "that" means we've just shown that the heron was able to use a tool, and "how" means we've explained how the heron used a tool. But since the description of what the heron did speaks for itself, there's effectively little or no difference in meaning. Even with "that", it's still obvious to the reader that the description also explains how .
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AngliholicBy any chance, could "how" be thought of as "interjection?" Therefore, is it also correct to view "how the heron was able to ... tool" as an interjectional clause? If yes, does this interjectional clause add more emphasis to the base sentence than the "that clause?"In this sentence, "how" can't be an "interjection" in the everyday sense that I unders
Mr WordyWell, "that" means we've just shown that the heron was able to use a tool, and "how" means we've explained how the heron used a tool. But since the description of what the heron did speaks for itself, there's effectively little or no difference in meaning. Even with "that", it's still obvious to the reader that the description also expl
PeaceblinkfriendMr Wordy, when you said 'speaks for itself', did you mean that the description of what the heron did can be understood easily? I am sorry but I don't understand why there would effectively be little of no difference in meaning if 'the description speaks for itself'.What I mean is that the nature of the account referred to by "This shows that/