0
Reegis Posted 10 years ago
Grammar

Third person and zero article?

Hello.

There are many ways to describe oneself. For example, I can use first person and it is straightforward:

1) I am a mathematician who...

But sometimes it is written in third person:

2a) A mathematician who...
2b) The mathematician who...
2c) Mathematician who...

And of course it is context that makes it clear who we are talking about (for example one's description on Linkedin portal).

My question is - which sentence from the above (2a-2c) is correct? Can we use the zero article this way or maybe it is better to use the definite or indefinite article?

--------------------------------
By the way, should I say "first person" or "the first person"?

I read about this topic here:
http://www.quickanddirtytips.com/education/grammar/first-second-and-third-person

And for example I can see the two sentences:
- You probably know what it means to write in the first person, but you may not be as confident about using the second- or third-person point of view.
- In grammatical terms, first person, second person, and third person refer to personal pronouns.
Does anyone know why we have 'the' in the first sentence, but not in the second one?
  

Top answer

" The following are fragments, noun phrases, or bullet points, not complete sentences. On CVs, people often write in fragments. 2a) A mathematician who...

  • " The following are fragments, noun phrases, or bullet points, not complete sentences.
  • On CVs, people often write in fragments.
  • 2a) A mathematician who...
  • 2b) The mathematician who...
  • (You are unique in the entire history of the planet Earth) 2c) Mathematician who..
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

13 Answers
0
This is a complete sentence: "I am the mathematician who solved Fermat's Last Theorem."

The following are fragments, noun phrases, or bullet points, not complete sentences. On CVs, people often write in fragments.

2a) A mathematician who...
2b) The mathematician who... (You are unique in the entire history of the planet Earth)
2c) Mathemati
0
AlpheccaStars2a) A mathematician who...2b) The mathematician who... (You are unique in the entire history of the planet Earth)2c) Mathematician who... (Incorrect)
2c is incorrect so it is out, also I am neither Euler nor Gauss so also 2b is out and the winner is 2a
0
  • A mathematician who likes algebra and the probability calculus.
  • Interested in physics, biology and programming.



They are not parallel structures, so the style is quite problematic. When you do bullet points, the preferred professional style is to have parallel structures. You have made a noun phrase and a non-finite clause.
0
I had no idea there is such a thing like parallel structures... But I googled it a little bit:
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/623/01/
And I must say it makes sense and looks nice:) The only question might be to what degree one should follow a given pattern. In my example it could b
0
The first looks fine. It contains all predicates.

You don't have to go further. Each bullet point should be the same structure. It's not required, or sensible that they should be the same length.

Remember this point of style when you make Powerpoint presentations.
0
I see Emotion: smile

Let me ask two final questions:
2) Is this form (in my example above) appropriate for websites like Linkedin?
0
Reegis2) Is this form (in my example above) appropriate for websites like Linkedin?
Look at some of the other profiles. If many use this format, then I suppose it's appropriate.
Reegis1) When it comes to grammar, is it completely correct?
Yes. Writing bullet points is more a question of style than grammar. Of course you ne
0
Thank you so much AlpheccaStarts. I am very grateful for your help. If I can repay you for your kindness, just let me know Emotion: smile
0
Let me get back to this topic...

I went over some Linkedin profiles and noticed that people (including native speakers) often don't use articles in context that was discussed earlier. Just as an example:

https://www.linkedin.com/in/richardslawrence

"Experie
0
ReegisDo you see any explanation of this?
In a compound noun, only the first article is necessary.
In lists of qualifications, the subject-verb (I am...) is frequently omitted.
In the two lists below, the second sounds quite repetitive.

[ I am an ]
  • experienced software developer,
  • agile coach, and
  • technical l

Related Questions