0
Navitasan Posted 14 years ago
Grammar

They must arrive tomorrow

Are these sentences correct:

1-If they left yesterday, they must arrive tomorrow.
2-If they left yesterday, they have to arrive tomorrow.
3-If they left yesterday, they should arrive tomorrow.

They are supposed to express an inference. If they have left yesterday, then it is (highly) likely that they will arrive tomorrow,

Gratefully,
Navi.
  

Top answer

All three are correct, but only the last one seems really idiomatic to me. Obligation (as shown by expressions like "must" and "have to") is seldom conditional on any other factors (such as whether "they left yesterday"). Here are the modals that make the most sense to me in that context: If they left yesterday, they [will / may / might / could / should] arrive tomorrow.

  • All three are correct, but only the last one seems really idiomatic to me.
  • Obligation (as shown by expressions like "must" and "have to") is seldom conditional on any other factors (such as whether "they left yesterday").
  • Here are the modals that make the most sense to me in that context: If they left yesterday, they [will / may / might / could / should] arrive tomorrow.
  • will shows speaker confidence.
  • may, might, and could show logical possibility.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

5 Answers
0
All three are correct, but only the last one seems really idiomatic to me. Obligation (as shown by expressions like "must" and "have to") is seldom conditional on any other factors (such as whether "they left yesterday").

Here are the modals that make the most sense to me in that context:

If they left yesterday, they [will / may / might / could / should] arrive tomorrow.
0
Thank you CalifJim for all your kind replies,

So "have to" and "must" necessarily imply obligation and not liklihood in these contexts?

One would not say:

4-If the letter was sent yesterday, it must arrive tomorrow.
or:
5-If the letter was sent yesterday, it has to arrive tomorrow.

M
0
navitasanSo "have to" and "must" necessarily imply obligation and not likelihood in these contexts?
... obviously not "it is obliged to arrive tomorrow"
I completely understand the question, but to be honest, because of the if-clause, neither interpretation springs to mind immediately for a native speaker. One is
0
Thank you very much CalifJim,

I have one more question here:

Could "should" be used in such cases not to imply logical necessity or likelihood, but obligation.

Is this sentence correct:
A-If you have received our letter, you should reply by next week.

Gratefully,
Navi.
0
navitasanIs this sentence correct:A-If you have received our letter, you should reply by next week.
It's correct, and it is much more likely to be interpreted as obligation than expectation (logical likelihood).

Isolated sentences with 'should' are often ambiguous.

He should reply by next week.
1. I expect him to reply by next

Related Questions