0
Manohonor Posted 22 years ago
Grammar

There's/there're

In some movies I heard these:

THERE'S PEOPLE OUT THERE!

THERE'S TWO PARTS.

I'm completely confused. Why not THERE'RE? Grammatically these sentences are incorrect. And yet I heard them!

Please explain to me.

Thanks in advance.
  

Top answer

There's is easier to say than there're. It may not be grammatically correct but it is common in speech.

  • There's is easier to say than there're.
  • It may not be grammatically correct but it is common in speech.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

12 Answers
0
There's is easier to say than there're. It may not be grammatically correct but it is common in speech.
0
Good explanation, Nona. I concur.
0
You mean I can say THERE'S instead of THERE'RE on an official briefing and nobody will even
notice that this is wrong?
0
Say it, yes. Write it there are.
0
Thanks you all for this, let's continue the theme:

1)What you looking at?

Why not WHAT ARE YOU LOOKING AT?

ARE - is not necessary in speech?

2)She here yet?

Why not IS SHE HERE YET?

IS - is not necessary in speech?

Can I do this with all questions or only wtih some, if with some please tell with which exactly.

I mea
0
We're getting deeper into the realm of colloquial speech and individual opinion, Manohonor-- there are not such rules for what you can say, as there are for what you should write.

(1) To me indicates a lack of a proper education and upbringing. Of course, the extreme reduction of the initial /hwuch?/ may in fact represent 'what are you'. The full sentence should, in any case, be prope
0
And the same thing happens to

HOW'S THINGS? (Instead of HOW ARE)

HERE'S SOME BOOKS (Instead of HERE ARE)?

Thanks in advance
0
How closely you imitate this kind of speech depends on the people you are interacting with. It also depends on how good your English is, even on how good your pronunciation is.

If you don't mimic the sounds exactly and make them "sloppy" in the "right way" -- the way a native English speaker would instinctively do it, then as a non-native speaker, you will probably not sound very authe
0
Use the full versions in writing and in formal speech. The others you should perhaps think of as verbal shortcuts - those who know the territory well might nip down a shortcut rather than take the offical path but it is easy to get lost!

You will never be wrong if you use the fully correct version.
0
In addition to the fabulous advice you've received already,

1)What you looking at? ('are' is necessary for Standard English, which isn't to say that omitting 'are' is incorrect for other dialects of English)

Spoken forms:
What are you looking at?
What're you looking at? ('what' and 'are' contract; the apostrophe (') represents 'a' of 'are')
Whadarya you lookin

Related Questions