There is no need to be afraid.

"No need exists in being afraid" you might want to think again about this sentance. It sounds wrong to me. Saying that there is no need to afraid is actually saying: don't be afraid, there is nothing to fear. As simple as that.

Hi Ayadi Ghait,Yes, your way enlightens me. I have no English gene and step by step is only my way to keep track of English, that have to provide clear tracks to let me to depend on them.Your talks open a window to see more similar usage that is use to me.

{nothing and there}:( 1 ) There's nothing in this box:it's empty.(to become my dependable track, it has to be rephrased) Nothing exixts there which is surrounded or contained in this box. ( 2 ) You'll have to have bread------there's nothing else to eat.(rephrased) nothing else (no other thing) exists there in the thing to eat. This guy is similar unto my topic : There is no need to be af

{ sense and there and where }( 1 ) There's no sense in getting angry about it. (rephrased) No sense exists there in getting angry about it. ( 2 ) Where's the sense in going by boat when the plane costs no more and is quicker?(rephrased) The sense exists where? where is surrounded or contained in going by boat.

{use and there}( 1 ) There is no use crying over spilt milk. (rephrased) No use exists there according to crying over spilt milk.{no smoke and there}( 1 ) There is no smoke without fire. (rephrased) No smoke exists there which without fire.