Yes. It's use here would be rare. It would be necessary only when there's no transitive verb.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
AvangiIt would be necessary only when there's no transitive verb.The construction posted by the OP is passive voice, i.e. the verb is always transitive. Your construction is completely different. It's plain old active voice with the verb "to be" as the lexical verb, i.e.