In the sentence with the verb which has two object clauses, I always use the same structure as 1) because I don't know whether the others are correct. Are which sentences correct?; would you please select the numbers of the correct sentences, judging form grammar and not considering of the context?
In the below sentences, the verb 'think' affect two 'that' clauses
1) I think you have to study hard, that you also should participate in a club activity. 2) I think you have to study hard, that also should participate in a club activity. 3) I think you have to study hard, and that you should participate in a club activity. 4) I think you have to study hard and that should participate in a club activity. 5) I think you have to study hard, and then that you should participate in a club activity. 6) I think you have to study hard and then that should participate in a club activity.
In advance, thank you for your help !!
Top answer
3 and 5 are correct grammar. (5 has an odd meaning).
— Clive
3 and 5 are correct grammar.
(5 has an odd meaning).
Free · every Monday
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
OK. 1) I think we have to learn to speak English, so that we can get some more chance to take a job. Could other people take it that the 'so that' clause is the object clause, not the adverbial clause?
OK. 1) I think we have to learn to speak English, so that we can have more chances to get a job. Could other people take it that the 'so that' clause is the object clause, not the adverbial clause? No.
2) I think (that) I feel thirsty or that I want a beer. A more logical-sound