0
Park sang joon Posted 12 years ago
Grammar

The verb 'form'

The future perfect tense of this passive is formed the following.

The verb 'form' doesn't have two objects, so can I take the following as pseudo-complement? , as in "Whereas the water of a stream flows unimpeded through an open channel, groundwater must move through small, constricted passage." even though parts of speech of each complement isn't the same.

Thank you in advance for your help.
  

Top answer

park sang joon The future perfect tense of this passive is formed the following. That sentence makes no sense, and I cannot see the connection between it and what follows. There is no future perfect passive in your post.

— Fivejedjon

  • park sang joon The future perfect tense of this passive is formed the following.
  • That sentence makes no sense, and I cannot see the connection between it and what follows.
  • There is no future perfect passive in your post.
Free · every Monday

Get the Weekly English Kit 📬

New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.

15 Answers
0
park sang joonThe future perfect tense of this passive is formed the following.
That sentence makes no sense, and I cannot see the connection between it and what follows. There is no future perfect passive in your post.
0
0
Thank you, fivejedjon, for your reply. Emotion: smile
I'm so sorry; I have mad another mistake.
0
0
park sang joon"The future perfect tense of this passive is formed the following." itself is a sentence.
It is not a complete sentence. And, as I have said, even if it were, it would have no connection with the following passage following, which contains no future perfect passive form. So, I am not sure exactly what you are asking about.
0
0
This is full text. Emotion: crying
"The sentence 1) It will has been seen after a while is ungrammatical - the future perfect tense of this pa
0
0
park sang joon"The sentence 1) It will has been seen after a while is ungrammatical - the future perfect tense of this passive is formed the following: It will have been seen after a while."
It's incorrect. It was probably mistyped because the writer was in a hurry, or, if it was in a book, the editor missed it and failed to correct it. Here is the intended
0
0
Thank you, Mr Jim, for your valuable answer Emotion: smile
0
0
Hello Mr.Jim
I'd like to ask one more thing to you.

"The sentence 1) It will has been seen after a while is ungrammatical; the future perfect tense of this passive is formed the following: It will have been seen after a while."
In any chance, can't we take 'the following' as a secondary predication?
0
0
park sang joonBy any chance, can't we take 'the following' as a secondary predication?
No. Not in ... is formed the following: ....

It's just grammatically incorrect.
0
0
Thank you Mr.Jim for your valuable reply and correction of the error in my post Emotion: smile

(The expression is "by (any) chanc
0
0
Especially with a transitive verb as the verb 'follow' in my example.
0

Related Questions