0
Anonymous Posted 16 years ago
Grammar
The usage of "let alone"
Is there any difference between two sentenses?
A lazy man like him doesn't bother to read your letters, let alone to answer them.
A lazy man like him doesn't bother to read your letters, let alone answer them.
The presense of "to" after "let alone" makes any difference?
Any advice would be appreciated.
Thanks
Kn
A lazy man like him doesn't bother to read your letters, let alone to answer them.
A lazy man like him doesn't bother to read your letters, let alone answer them.
The presense of "to" after "let alone" makes any difference?
Any advice would be appreciated.
Thanks
Kn
Top answer
Hi, there any difference between two sentenses? A lazy man like him doesn't bother to read your letters, let alone to answer them. A lazy man like him doesn't bother to read your letters, let alone answer them.
- Hi, there any difference between two sentenses?
- A lazy man like him doesn't bother to read your letters, let alone to answer them.
- A lazy man like him doesn't bother to read your letters, let alone answer them.
- The presense of "to" after "let alone" makes any difference?
- Not really.
Get the Weekly English Kit 📬
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
1 Answers
0
Hi,
there any difference between two sentenses?
A lazy man like him doesn't bother to read your letters, let alone to answer them.
A lazy man like him doesn't bother to read your letters, let alone answer them.
The presense of "to" after "let alone" makes any difference? Not really. But I usually hear it without 'to'. Probably because a more common form is per
there any difference between two sentenses?
A lazy man like him doesn't bother to read your letters, let alone to answer them.
A lazy man like him doesn't bother to read your letters, let alone answer them.
The presense of "to" after "let alone" makes any difference? Not really. But I usually hear it without 'to'. Probably because a more common form is per
0
Related Questions