If, when Erickson refers to "the unconscious part of the mind," he is referring to the mute or non-dominant hemisphere, then the pattern of emergence of the visual representational system which we have noted in Erickson's work as well as our own is understandable.
Hello, do you think the following intreperation of mine on the speaker's words above is correct?
unconscious mind = the mute or non-dominant hemisphere
unconscious mind = the pattern of the emergence of visual respresentational system
Thanks!
unconscious mind = the mute or non-dominant hemisphere Yes. But note that it is stated as a possibility ( ie if he is referring to), not as a fact.
New words, one handy idiom, and a 2-minute quiz — delivered to your inbox to keep your streak alive.
unconscious mind = the mute or non-dominant hemisphere Yes.
But note that it is stated as a possibility ( ie if he is referring to), not as a fact.
The structure of the speaker's sentence is this.
If, when Ericson refers to A, he is referring to B, then C is understandable.
Logically, this does not mean that A = B, or that A = C.
You can't just ignore the f